Prev. 100Magna Carta2 Magna est veritas, et prævalebit1 Magnesia1 Magnesium1 Magnesium sulphate1 Magnet6Magnet Operation1 Magnet Pole1 Magnet therapy1 Magnetic andElectro-magnetic Equipo...1 Magnetic Cut-out1 Magnetic Equator1 Magnetic Field of Force1 Magnetic Figures1 Magnetic Filament1 Magnetic Fluids1 Magnetic Flux1 Magnetic Force1 Magnetic Friction1 Magnetic Friction Gear1 Magnetic Gear1 Magnetic Hysteresis1 Magnetic Inclination1 Magnetic Induction2 Magnetic Inertia1 Magnetic Insulation1 Magnetic Intensity1 Magnetic Lag1 Magnetic Latitude1 Magnetic Leakage1 Magnetic Limit1 Magnetic Lines of Force1 Magnetic Mass1 Magnetic Matter1 Magnetic Memory1 Magnetic Meridian1 Magnetic Moment1 Magnetic Needle1 Magnetic Output1 Magnetic Parallels1 Magnetic Permeability1 Magnetic Perturbations1 Magnetic Pole1 Magnetic Poles1 Magnetic Potential2 Magnetic Proof Piece1 Magnetic Proof Plane1 Magnetic Quantity1 Magnetic Reluctance1 Magnetic Reluctivity1 Magnetic Remanence1 Magnetic Retentivity1 Magnetic Rotary Polarization1 Magnetic Saturation1 Magnetic Screen1 Magnetic Self-induction1 Magnetic Separator1 Magnetic Shell1 Magnetic Shield1 Magnetic Shunt1 Magnetic Storm1 Magnetic Storms1 Magnetic Strain1 Magnetic Stress1 Magnetic Susceptibility1 Magnetic Tick1 Magnetic Top1 Magnetic Twist1 Magnetic Vane Ammeter1 Magnetic Variations1 Magnetism12 Magnetism of Gases1 Magnetism Sub-permanent1 Magnetization by Double Touch1 Magnetization by Separate Touch1 Magnetization by Single Touch1 Magnetization by the Earth1 Magnetization Curve1 Magnetizing Coil1 Magnet-keeper1 Magneto1 Magneto Bell1 Magneto Call Bell1 Magneto-electric Brake1 Magneto-electric Generator1 Magneto-electric Telegraph1 Magneto-electric. adj.1 Magnetograph1 Magneto-Inductor1 Magnetometer1 Magnetometry1 Magneto-motive Force1 Magnetophone1 Magnetoscope1 Magni nominis umbra1 Magnificat1 Magnificent1 Magnifying Spring Ammeter1 Magnitude1 Magnum Bonum2 Prev. 100


n. Something acted upon by magnetism.

Effect of Light on the Magnet

In 1854, Sir John Ross stated to the British Association, in proof of the effect of every description of light on the magnet, that during his last voyage in the Felix, when frozen in about one hundred miles north of the magnetic pole, he concentrated the rays of the full moon on the magnetic needle, when he found it was five degrees attracted by it.

Power of the Sun's Rays in Increasing the Strength of Magnets

Professor Barlocci found that an armed natural loadstone, which would carry 1½ Roman pounds, had its power nearly doubled  by twenty-four hours' exposure to the strong light of the sun. M. Zantedeschi found that an artificial horse-shoe loadstone, which carried 13½ oz., carried 3½ more by three days' exposure, and at last arrived to 31 oz. by continuing it in the sun's light. He found that while the strength increased in oxidated magnets, it diminished in those which were not oxidated, the diminution becoming insensible when the loadstone was highly polished. He now concentrated the solar rays upon the loadstone by means of a lens; and he found that, both in oxidated and polished magnets, they acquire  strength when their north  pole is exposed to the sun's rays, and lose  strength when the south  pole is exposed.—Sir David Brewster.

Electro-Magnets of the Horse-Shoe Form

were discovered by Sturgeon in 1825. Of two Magnets made by a process devised by M. Elias, and manufactured by M. Logemeur at Haerlem, one, a single horse-shoe magnet weighing about 1 lb., lifts 28½ lbs.; the other, a triple horse-shoe magnet of about 10 lbs. weight, is capable of lifting about 150 lbs. Similar magnets are made by the same person capable of supporting 5 cwt. In the process of making them, a helix of copper and a galvanic battery are used. The smaller magnet has twice the power expressed by Haecker's formula for the best artificial steel magnet.

Subsequently Henry and Ten Eyk, in America, constructed some electro-magnets on a large scale. One horse-shoe magnet made by them, weighing 60 lbs., would support more than 2000 lbs.

In September 1858, there were constructed for the Atlantic-telegraph cable at Valentia two permanent magnets, from which the electric induction is obtained: each is composed of 30 horse-shoe magnets, 2½ feet long and from 4 to 5 inches broad; the induction coils attached to these each contain six miles of wire, and a shock from them, if passed through the human body, would be sufficient to destroy life.

Power of A Magnet

The Power of a Magnet is estimated by the weight its poles are able to carry. Each pole singly is able to support a smaller weight than when they both act together by means of a keeper, for which reason horse-shoe magnets are superior to bar magnets of similar dimensions and character. It has further been ascertained that small magnets have a much greater relative force than large ones.

When magnetism is excited in a piece of steel in the ordinary mode, by friction with a magnet, it would seem that its inductive power is able to overcome the coercive power of the steel only to a certain depth below the surface; hence we see why small pieces of steel, especially if not very hard, are able to carry greater relative weights than large magnets. Sir Isaac Newton wore in a ring a magnet weighing only 3 grains, which would lift 760 grains, i. e. 250 times its own weight.

Bar-magnets are seldom found capable of carrying more than their own weight; but horse-shoe magnets of similar steel will bear considerably more. Small ones of from half an ounce to 1 ounce in weight will carry from 30 to 40 times their own weight; while such as weigh from 1 to 2 lbs. will rarely carry more than from 10 to 15 times their weight. The writer found a 1 lb. horse-shoe magnet that he impregnated by means of the feeder able to bear 26½ times its own weight; and Fischer, having adopted the like mode of magnetising the steel, which he also carefully heated, has made magnets of from 1 to 3 lbs. weight that would carry 30 times, and others of from 4 to 6 lbs. weight that would carry 20 times, their own weight.—Professor Peschel.

How Artificial Magnets Are Made

In 1750, Mr. Canton, F.R.S., “one of the most successful experimenters in the golden age of electricity,”[1] communicated to the Royal Society his “Method of making Artificial Magnets without the use of natural ones.” This he effected by using a poker and tongs to communicate magnetism to steel bars. He derived his first hint from observing them one evening, as he was sitting by the fire, to be nearly in the same direction with the earth as the dipping needle. He thence concluded that they must, from their position and the frequent blows they receive, have acquired some magnetic virtue, which on trial he found to be the case; and therefore he employed them to impregnate his bars, instead of having recourse to the natural loadstone. Upon the reading of the above paper, Canton exhibited to the Royal Society his experiments, for which the Copley Medal was awarded to him in 1751.

Canton had, as early as 1747, turned his attention, with complete success, to the production of powerful artificial magnets, principally in consequence of the expense of procuring those made by Dr. Gowan Knight, who kept his process secret. Canton for several years abstained from communicating his method even to his most intimate friends, lest it might be injurious to Dr. Knight, who procured considerable pecuniary advantages by touching needles for the mariner's compass.

At length Dr. Knight's method of making artificial magnets was communicated to the world by Mr. Wilson, in a paper published in the 69th volume of the Philosophical Transactions. He provided himself with a large quantity of clean iron-filings, which he put into a capacious tub about half full of clear water; he then agitated the tub to and fro for several hours, until the filings were reduced by attrition to an almost impalpable powder. This powder was then dried, and formed into paste by admixture with linseed-oil. The paste was then moulded into convenient shapes, which were exposed to a moderate heat until they had attained a sufficient degree of hardness.

After allowing them to remain for some time in this state, Dr. Knight gave them their magnetic virtue in any direction he pleased, by placing them between the extreme ends of his large magazine of artificial magnets for a second or more, as he saw occasion. By this method the virtue they acquired was such, that when any one of these pieces was held between two of his best ten-guinea bars, with its poles purposely inverted, it immediately of itself turned about to recover its natural direction, which the force of those very powerful bars was not sufficient to counteract.

Dr. Knight's powerful battery of magnets above mentioned is in the possession of the Royal Society, having been presented by Dr. John Fothergill in 1776.

[1] Canton was the first who in England verified Dr. Franklin's idea of the similarity of lightning and the electric fluid, July 1752.